Reading Reflection: Miserando

So far, we’ve been thinking about accessibility for disabilities as they are commonly understood, and we have expanded this to consider other populations such as the elderly, people with strollers, and those with temporary disabilities. Imagine accessibility and design for someone such as Miserando. What barriers may exist in your specific selected buildings or in general? What needs may chronically ill people have that you and/or your group have not considered yet? You do not have to be super specific, as you likely have not researched this, but use Miserando’s account of her daily life, and other knowledge you may have (if any), as a starting point. If you are at a loss for what barriers may exist, use this free write as a time to pose questions about accessibility and accommodations for chronic illness. You may also make connections to the Andrade & Ely reading on accessibility and spatial orientation.

In “The Spoon Theory,” Miserando explains life as a person with chronic illness. When her best friend asks her about what it feels to be sick with Lupus, Miserado is initially surprised: she thought her friend knew what there is to know about Lupus. But when her friend pursues asking about what it is like to go through life with Lupus, she spontaneously develops the “spoon theory.” She explains that most people start their day with a lot of energy and have a lot of control over their lives, but sick people often feel that they have a limited amount of effort and are not in control. To convey this point, Miserado grabs a handful of spoons and places them in her friend’s hands. She asks her friend to list off her daily tasks and takes spoons away one by one as her friend talks about things that require effort. The realness of holding the spoons and feeling them be taken away helps her friend understand how people with chronic illness live each day with a limited amount of energy and are always conscious of their illness.

I was touched by “The Spoon Theory”: Miserando’s story reminded me of the daily struggle of one of my family members who had a short term disability. The piece made me think about how buildings on campus can be more accessible for people with chronic or mental illnesses to help them feel as comfortable as possible. One of our buildings that struck me as being uncomfortable is the Physics building: the stairwell and hallways on the west side of the building are confined and narrow: between classes, they become jammed with people, forcing students to squeeze past one another. As a person without chronic illness, this experience is already unpleasant; for people with claustrophobia or limited mobility, I can only imagine how dreadful it must be to maneuver through that part of the building. I think open spaces are much more inviting and accessible. Another one of our buildings, the Lawson computer science building does a great job of this. It has wide hallways with tall ceilings and students always have plenty of space to move around. Other accessibility issues for people with chronic illness include heavy doors and elevators/restrooms that are difficult to reach from building entrances. When it comes to accessibility, it is important to do things in the best interest of people, not to comply with laws.

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “Reading Reflection: Miserando

  1. I really like the point you brought up about doing things in the best interest of people instead of just complying with laws. All too often it seems that when it comes to accessibility only the bare minimum is done to accommodate for people, and many still have issues maneuvering in buildings. I also thought the comparison you made was a good description of how we can change accommodations to encompass a wider variety of disabled people. One thing that might make a difference in the two buildings is when they were built; I believe that the Lawson building is comparably newer than the physics building, so I’m sure new implementations have been made to make the area more inviting to all. Altogether it would be beneficial for our university to have more accessible buildings such as Lawson to make the space there is more open and inviting.

    Like

  2. I completely agree with the narrow, cramped spaces in multiple buildings. Even the lobby areas in some buildings can become easily congested with enough people in it and the hallways turn into a highway of bodies. I find it amazing how easily people can overlook such simple, but important details to make things more accessible for people who require it in their daily lives. I like the comparison you made between one building which lacked accommodations and one that had proper spacial orientation.

    Like

  3. I really feel that spatial constraints is something that should be taken into consideration when planning out the ergonomics of the building. A lot of buildings which have narrow stairways and pathways make it difficult to access most of the areas of the building, and also make it uncomfortable for a lot us. Spatial accessibility poses problems not only for the disabled, but for everyone else too, and if considered in building implementations, can significantly increase the ease of accessibility of a building.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s